Saturday, November 15, 2014

Consultation Psychology

Consultants, specifically organizational consultants are specialist that aid in organizations to become more productive, efficient, cope with downsizing, time management, organizational changes, team development, and other process to survive through with situation changes or problems. The process of organizational consulting can address the overall operations of the organization or focus on specific aspects (Mann, 2012). Performance of a consultant role in most cases requires a mastery set of knowledge and proficiency of specific skills, however many consultants acquire distinct and varied set of skills that are particular within organizational settings. 
This document will provide an in-depth evaluation of consulting and assess professional competencies in reference to the case study that focuses on an organizations need to introduce a new set of processes within the Marketing department. The case study emphasizes the need for a smooth transition into the new processes while encouraging a more co-operative, self -managing, and resilient department. Including in this document is an overview of the case study, a description of consulting theories and basis in evidence that identify and describe the implementation phase of consultation, psychological underpinnings, and compare and contrast of theories based on their usefulness and basis in evidence. Also included is a synthesis of key concepts and best aspects of methods according to theory and an in-depth evaluation of the consulting process that comprise a compare and contrast of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to evaluation.
Consultation Psychology
Case Study
The case study focus was on team development through introduction of new procedures, product launches, and training plans. The organization Danone team of customer service advisors within the Marketing department was to go through considerable changes within the organization (FreshTracks, n.d.). The Marketing team is made up of parents and healthcare professionals that support baby food products within the organization. The organization wanted the process to go smoothly and help the department deal with the changes in a positive and pro -active way. Danone wanted to encourage a more co-operative, self -managing, and resilient unit (FreshTracks, n.d.).
The case studies focus on the consultant and client ability to efficiently and smoothly transition a department through various new processes. The consultant is responsible for acquiring information through consultation processes that would aid in the transition of the department and acquire any helpful insight from the client. The insights acquired during the consultation processes would be beneficial to comprehending facets of organizational consultation processes, appropriate techniques and methods, and evaluation processes to efficiently provide the client with services requested. 
Consulting Theories and Evidence
Theories are often the basis of how consultants work. Consulting theories aid in identifying concepts that would be beneficial during the process of consultation. The client’s consultation is to identify methods that would aid in a smooth transition of new processes within the Marketing department which consist of parents and healthcare professionals. Consulting theories can provide a consultant with a better understanding of the client and individual’s involved in the process. Through various consulting theories, two theories that can aid in the client’s specific need positive psychology oriented consulting and Adlerian theory will focus on providing the encouragement, support, and understanding of the individuals that are going through the process of departmental change.
Positive Psychology Oriented Consulting
Positive psychology oriented consulting is important within organizations regards organizations as macro contexts that shape positive stages and positive outcomes for individuals, groups, and whole organizations (Hefferon & Boniwell, 2011). Positive psychology promotes positive organizational behavior that focuses on developing positive psychological states that enhance performance (Hefferon & Boniwell, 2011). Positive organizations practice positive methods and incorporate positive activities. These methods and activities allow for employee's to be open towards job variety, confidence, creativity, team building, developing strengths, and understand how to set clear goals, accept feedback, and take on appropriate challenges (Hefferon & Boniwell, 2011).
Implementing positive psychology is an essential role in transitioning change within the organization. Positive psychology will aid in integrating a vision, endorse strategy, then guide and coordinate the process by which the strategy will be implemented. Changes within departments involve a process of experimentation and learning, because it is impossible to anticipate all the problems or to prepare detailed plans for how to carry out all aspects of the change (Baligh, Burton, Obel, 1996). The Marketing department consists primarily of parents and healthcare professionals and encouraging them through the change process implements support and strengthens the ability to change within the department.
Positive psychology psychological underpinnings present a clearer and theoretical perspective. The application of psychological consultation of positive psychology focuses on the strengths of the client and the employee's. Application of this theory will acknowledge what is good about the departmental change and create a vision to perceive a sense of purpose and strategies to achieve this purpose (Baligh, Burton, Obel, 1996). Positive psychology would outline the client and employee's strengths regardless of weakness and present an opportunity for fulfillment, growth, and success through developmental processes and application.
Adlerian Theory
Adlerian consulting focuses on the components of individual psychology. Use of Adlerian consulting asks clients to identify behaviors or traits they find more appropriate and desirable, this provide the client and employees with techniques and opportunities to try their desired behavior or trait (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2012). Adlerian consulting is appropriate in training programs for pre-service and in service for use in consulting within organizations. Adlerian consulting concepts can be applied to programs that can beneficial for client and can provide information for consulting. Adlerian consulting can aid in clients creating new images for themselves by viewing his or her past, present, and future goals (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2012). Adlerian consulting identifies the needs, strengths, and goals of the client in order to encourage growth and positive change. Adler's theory emphasis on healthy relationships and recognition of the links between employee well -being and organizational effectiveness. Adlerian consulting works with organizations to help them identify and address specific issues, strategies, efficiency, team building, and workplace growth (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2012).
Implementation of the Adlerian theory promotes growth and full potential of the employees. It presents a sense of belonging, contribution, equality, and cooperation. The employees affected by the departmental change would feel value and significant, this implementation is vital because changes within an organization can present stress and be painful for some employees. Adlerian theory will allow for implementation of diverse perspectives and leadership behaviors of motivation, support, and guidance.
The psychological underpinnings of Adlerian theory can be useful for work with diverse characteristics and personalities. According to Feist and Feist (2009) defining characteristics within an organizational change can give employees a feeling of oneness with all, and as a member of a larger whole within the organization, a sense of empathy and concern for others all through the cooperation of change. Individual characteristics and personalities could present positive or negative outcomes and applying psychological consulting applications, such as Adlerian theory could aid in reducing or diminishing concerns for overwhelmed employees.
Compare and Contrast
            Positive psychology and Adlerian theory both possess strengths and limitation within the aid of the process of organizational change. The client is seeking aid within the Marketing department to smoothly transition its employees in the process of implementing new processes positively and in a pro-active way. Each theory of consultation present basis of evidence that allows for the client and consultant to comprehend to the methods necessary to efficiently and effectively follow through requested processes. Positive psychology basis of evidence lay focus on areas of study and practice that emphasize positive emotions, positive traits, and positive institutions. Positive emotions consist of contentment, happiness, and hope for future outcomes. Positive traits consist of resilience, self -knowledge, and creativity. Positive institutions consist of community interactions within organizations that can benefit through the tools of positive psychology.
            Positively psychology strengths recognizes that over the years there are many positive constructs in organizational development that positively reinforce structure, procedure development, commitment, and prosocial behavior. Positive psychology theory-building processes of research attempt to address new and relatively unique workplace psychological resources (Youssef & Luthans, 2007). Through the strengths of positive psychology the client’s request for smooth transition will not only be managed in a pro-active way but will also produce a more resilient, self-managing, and co-operative unit. The limitations of positive psychology is its failure to equally address the weaknesses of an individual or group (Held, 2004). Positive psychology emphasizes positive methods and perceptions in order to encourage a more positive environment. This theory does not fully address negative attitudes that could come into play. Some employees could feel bad about the new work situation and cannot manage to transcend their negative attitude no matter what and end up feeling worse, guilty or defective to the current situation (Held, 2004).
            In comparison to positive psychology, Adlerian theory possess many strengths, such as its ability to be applied to diverse situations, including the concept of encouragement amongst the client and consultant during the process of consultation. Adlerian theory addresses individual goal directed characteristics and the need to finding success, fulfillment, and meaning within work environments. Adlerian theory encourages positive characteristics and behavior amongst individuals. Positive characteristics and behaviors promote positive outcomes during the process of departmental change and can be viewed through the employees as support and guidance during this process. Adlerian theory assumes an individual's characteristics and behavior.  Adlerian theory limitations fail to provide empirical support for Adlerian concepts and approaches in reference to individual organizational developmental processes (Ivey et. al., 2007). In contrast to positive psychology, Adlerian theory has its limitations but the benefits of implementing many of the concepts in reference to individual development and psychological process within an organization outweigh its limitations (Ivey et. al., 2007).
Synthesis of Consulting Theories
            Positive psychology and Adlerian theory both focus on processes that integrates effective key concepts into the departmental process of transitioning new processes. Positive psychology and Adlerian theory each emphasize concepts of encouragement, creativity, growth, and developing strengths. These approaches helps provide a set of guidelines to abide by for actions through the implementation of each through the process of helping a client with departmental changes. The set of guidelines create a view of the need for change, these set of guidelines considers the client and those who are involved in the process. The set of guidelines includes, informed progress of change, demonstrate optimism and commitment to change, prepare those involved in change, provide support, and identify essential roles through the change.
            Informed progress of change helps communicate what steps have been initiated, what changes have been completed, and what improvements have occurred in performance. The process of change can have diverse effects on individuals and can cause anxiety and stress. It is important to keep the client and employees informed on the process and open communication (Yukl, 2009). Providing optimism and commitment to change endorses dedication and guarantee through to the end of the process. Change process can encounter various setbacks and sacrifices and it is vital for the employees to understand that the consultant and client are committed to the process (Yukl, 2009). Preparing the employees for the process of change can consist of training, stress management, and how to adjust to the new changes being implemented. Changes within a department can overwhelm some, providing methods and preparing for change can help employees to cope. Providing support and identifying essential roles is to identify employees who support is necessary to make the change within the department happen smoothly (Yukl, 2009). This guideline assess key employees who would valuable to successfully implementing the new departmental processes. Support helps obtain confidence of the employees and prepare employees to undertake the activities necessary for the change (Yukl, 2009).
Evaluation of Consulting Project
            Evaluation process involves looking at the client, the employees, gathering information about the current situation with the Marketing department, and preferences of the transition the client is seeking help for. The consultant is responsible for analyzing the situation and figuring out a method suitable to carry out the client’s request. The process of the consultation involves meeting members of the Marketing department, observing interactions, and developing a practical solution that would implement a smooth transition into new departmental processes.  As part of the consultation process, employee individual profiles were assessed and group sessions were attended to reflect self -management, teamwork, communication, and managing change. Diverse applications was used in order to gain a clearer picture between the consultant, the client, and the employees involved. Applications used consisted of activities that focused encouragement and review sessions that allowed for reflection and strategic plans to be developed.
            The evaluation identified employees, such as the parents and healthcare professionals whose support was essential within the process of transition. Communication between the consultant, client, and employees involved an explanation the process and prepared the employee’s for change and set a clear vision of the benefits to be gained during the process.  Possible approaches to evaluating this case study included Systematic consulting approach and Gestalt theory.
Systematic approach determines a system, which is independent of the concrete elements, such as concepts and principles of the organization, and provides a basis for unification (Campbell & Huffington, 2008). Systems concepts include system-environment boundary, input, output, process, goal directedness, and information. This approach looks at the whole in which the client, employees or situation is part of. This approach utilizes tools that include resolving team dynamic, evaluating options, individual development, and communication tactics (Campbell & Huffington, 2008). The strength in the approach lies in its ability to identify many possible meanings from which to construct an understanding of what is going on, how best to intervene. Its weakness is that it does not encourage individuals to develop a view of change from one opposition and continually generate new meanings leaving room for delayed reactions to opportunity (Campbell & Huffington, 2008).
Gestalt approach focuses on personal development and growth. This approach perceives a system capable of handling various situations through awareness and drive. Individuals create subjective meaning of his or her experiences and explore how one has become aware of these experiences (Bednarova, 2009). Strengths of Gestalt approach is that it addresses situations an individual or group might be facing and allow the individual to develop a method that aids in dealing with new challenges and create a positive outlook. This approach allows an individual to become aware of responsibility and self-awareness (Bednarova, 2009). The weaknesses of Gestalt approach is the appropriateness of individual awareness, such as an individual lacks the ability to recognize awareness of self and is unable to cope with the challenges of change (Bednarova, 2009). Gestalt approach pushes for self-awareness and emphasizes recognition for negative perceptions. An individual that lacks the ability to recognize his or her negativity through the process of the Gestalt approach can experience stress, depression, and are unaware of his or her faults in the situation (Bednarova, 2009).

References
Baligh, H. H., Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (1996). Organizational consultant: Creating a useable theory for organizational design. Management Science, 42(12). 1648-1662 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1648
Campbell, D., & Huffington, C. (Eds.). (2008). Organizations connected: A handbook of systemic consultation. Karnac Books.
Feist, J. & Feist, G. J., (2009). Adler: Individual psychology. In Theories of Personality, (7th ed.) p. 64-96. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Company.
Freshtracks (n.d) Case study: Team development. Retrieved from http://www.freshtracks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/FreshTracksCaseStudies.pdf
Gregory, S. (2014). AN INTRODUCTION TO GESTALT THERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE. Inner Dialogue In Daily Life: Contemporary Approaches to Personal and Professional Development in Psychotherapy, 129.
Hefferon, K. & Boniwell, I. (2011). Positive psychology: Theory, research, and applications. Berkshire, GBR: Open University Press
Held, B. S. (2004). The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 9-46. DOI: 10.1177/0022167803259645
Ivey, A. E., D'Andrea, M. D., Ivey, M. B., & Simek-Morgan, L. (2007). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy: A Multicultural perspective (6th ed). Pearson Higher Ed.
Mann, A. (2012. What organizational consultants do and what it takes to become one. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(5), 547-554. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2012.719440
Sommers-Flanagan, J. & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2012). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice study guide (2nd) Ed. Somerset, NJ: Wiley
Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leading change in organizations. In Leadership in organizations. (7th ed.) Pearson Education India.
Youssef, C. M. & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774-800. DOI: 10.1177/0149206307305562




Case Study: Discovery Phase of Consulting

Introduction
Consultants are professionals that can provide a service that can aid in a clients need for team development, organizational changes, or other situations and problems that might need consulting. Performance of a professional role in most cases requires mastery of a particular set of skills, however many consultants possess a diverse set of skills and services that are particular within organizational settings. Consulting skills and knowledge of organizational behavior requires specialized skills  to helping clients successfully and efficiently address any situation or problem within their organization (Mann, 2012). This document will discuss briefly on a case study that focuses on  a clients need to introduce a new set of processes within its Marketing department. The case study focuses on team development during the transition process and a way to efficiently and smoothly introduce the new processes.
This document will focus on the discovery phase and consultant competencies best practices for effectively evaluating the clients need.  The discovery phase and consulting competencies will provide a perspective of the process taken in order to gain information and steps to take in order to provide best practices.
Case Study
The case study focus was on team development through introduction of new procedures, product launches, and training plans. The organization Danone team of customer service advisors within the Marketing department was to go through considerable changes within the organization (FreshTracks, n.d.). The Marketing team is made up of parents and healthcare professionals that support baby food products within the organization. The organization wanted the process to go smoothly and help the department deal with the changes in a positive and pro -active way. Danone wanted to encourage a more co-operative, self -managing, and resilient unit (FreshTracks, n.d.).
The case studies focus on the consultant and client ability to efficiently and smoothly transition a department through various new processes. The consultant is responsible for acquiring information through discovery that would aid in the transition of the department and acquire any helpful insight from the client. The insights acquired during the discovery phase would be beneficial to better understand the appropriate techniques to be taken to efficiently transition the department.
Discovery
The discovery phase allows for unequivocal understanding of everything that there needs to be known about the client including past present and future. As a consultant, questions are important to gaining an understanding of the organization. According to (Chelliah, 2010) questions that could be asked in order to better process an organizations consultation should be relevant to the client. Questions for this case study to be asked are; what do you believe needs to be strengthened in order to support the departmental changes? (This question will aid in uncovering areas of weakness within the department), what options have you looked at to achieve departmental changes? (gains an understanding of what the client has done to this point, or what they are thinking about, can uncover something that may not have been thought of by the consultant), Did the need for change suddenly arise or has it been planned for a while? (If it suddenly arose, there might be more likelihood that the client will show stronger participation in the change) (Chelliah, 2010).
During this phase the more collaborative the consultant is in working with others of the client's organization, the effort of change will be more successful. When the client and the consultant work as a whole, the discovery phase allows for an understanding of the priority of change and how to efficiently and successfully address it (Chelliah, 2010). Together information can be collected and analyzed to categorized discoveries and assumptions, and then make references from information collected (Chelliah, 2010).
Different approaches can be taken during the phase of discovery. Two approaches to the discovery phase are the expert approach and the Process -consultation approach. Considering these approaches for this case study connects relevance to each process taken during this phase. The expert approach, the consultant is employed to identify the problem, analyze, diagnose, and recommend a resolution (Schein, 1999). The expert approach allows the client to provide the consultant with help in identifying the situation or problem, the consultant provides the expertise in order to appropriately apply a diagnosis (Schein, 1999). This approach, the client is able to identify and classify the problem and communicate relevant information to the consultant (Beitler, 2003).  In this case study the client show what process and direction within the direction the organization wants to go. The client is able to communicate the facets of the department and newly processes the organization wants to conduct. The consultant assessing the client understands it is vital to have expertise with regards to the client’s specific situation. The consultant is not anticipated by the client to train in diagnostic and problem solving (Schein, 1999).
Process -consultation approach, the client and consultant collaboratively assess the situation or problem. The consultant's duty is to train the client on diagnostic and situational problem -solving methods. Situational problem -solving is efficient when the client is able to identify the processes needed to be enhanced. The client is expected to be knowledgeable and insightful of the work within the organization (Schein, 1999). The client has an obligation to implement the action plan if involved in the diagnostic situational problem -solving in its entirety. When the client is not actively involved, the consulting arrangement can be unsuccessful (Schein, 1999).
  The expert approach and the process-consultation approach both work to diagnose and develop techniques during the process of discovery. In comparison, both approaches allows for the consultant to facilitate the client's decision making process and apply the client's valuable input throughout the process (Beitler, 2003). However, the expert approach, the clients need to come up with their own sense of the problem. In order to get the expertise they are looking for the client should have an understanding and ability to communicate exactly what is being requested. Process consultation involves the client to collaboratively diagnose the situation or problem and implement appropriate processes (Beitler, 2003).
The process of the discovery phase is important to also consider the personality facets of the client and the persons involved. According to Nada, Louchert, & Kakabadse (2006) personality styles act as self-systems that are an active forces concentrating on the preservation of social security and avoidance of anxiety. Self-systems are important during the phase of discovery because they are learned defensive activities against anxiety caused by factors of self-esteem and security. Personality is a motivator behind personal interaction anxieties can be heightened during the levels of stress encountered (Nada, Louchert, & Kakabadse, 2006). Personality style outcomes may reflect the social characteristics of the people or groups involved, creating a valuable relationship between the consultant and client (Nada, Louchert, & Kakabadse, 2006). 


Consulting Competencies
Competencies help consultants do their jobs and organizations achieve their goals. Competencies have a key role to play in disciplines such as performance management, success planning, career development and teambuilding. Competencies give organizations a competitive advantage in creating and delivering value within its organization (Little, 2010). Competencies define the abilities for those to excel in certain roles and abilities to perform that role adequately (Little, 2010). Competencies can be used to support an organization's strategy in recruitment and selection, assessment and development, team building and organizational culture (Little, 2010).  Through competencies best practices are used in order to assess appropriately. The case study competencies five best practices are utilized in order to appropriately assess the organization (Little, 2010).
The first best practice used is “consider organizational context This competency customizes specific proficiencies developed to influence the employee behaviors, organizational culture, life stage, and strengths and weaknesses of its management system (Campion et. al. 2011). The second best practice is to "start at the top" this competency has advantages of getting information from those who actually do the work (Campion et. al. 2011). This allows for management to interact and provide insight in reference to the future direction of the organization (Campion et. al. 2011).
The third best practice is to “consider future-oriented job requirements,” this competency focuses on the requirements of the current job and considers future methods for focus groups, team development, and future oriented requirements (Campion, et. al. 2011). The fourth best practice is to "define levels of proficiency on competencies" this competency focuses on various levels of proficiency that develop on the job performance and job grade level (Campion et. al. 2011). The levels can define standings of observable behaviors and contingencies in the appearance of the competency on the job (Campion et. al. 2011).  The last best practice includes the “fundamental (cross job) and technical (job specific) competencies,” This competency defines the profession within the organization. The fundamental competencies are applied to client and others within the organization. Each profession has a set of particular competencies, such as individual contributors, managers, and higher superiors of leadership (Campion et. al., 2011).
Conclusion
 An effective consultant should possess functional knowledge as well as knowledge of communication and analytical skills, stability, and intellect, also knowledge of personality traits beneficial to effective consulting (Banai & Tulimieri, 2013). The goal of the consultant is to build an open and honest relationship with the client. The discovery phase allows the consultant and client to build a trusting relationship according to vital information that is acquired during the process.
The client must be willing and open to providing necessary information in order for the consultant to do the job properly. The client should answer all questions as honest as possible and understand that the information being provided is essential to helping the organization (Wilson, 2009). Consulting competencies examines specific competencies focused on skills and development related to effective consulting (Wilson, 2009). The competencies for best practice are used to understand job roles, performance, and outcomes of the situation or problem.



References
Banai, M., & Tulimieri, P. (2013). Knowledge, skills and personality of the effective business consultant. The Journal of Management Development, 32(8), 886-900. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD-05-2011-0061
Beitler, M.A. (2003). Strategic organizational change. Greensboro, NC:
Practitioner Press International.
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
Chelliah, J. (2010). The psychodynamics of the client-consultant relationship. International Journal of Business and Information, 5(2), 135-150. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/856657850?accountid=27965
Little, B. (2010). Competency capers. Training Journal, 38-40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/202961153?accountid=27965
Freshtracks (n.d) Case study: Team development. Retrieved from http://www.freshtracks.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/FreshTracksCaseStudies.pdf
Mann, A. (2012). What Organizational Consultants Do and What it Takes to Become One: Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(5), 547-554. doi:10.1080/10481885.2012.719440
Nada, K. K., Louchert, E., & Kakabadse, A. (2006). Consultants role: A qualitative inquiry from the consultants perspective. Journal of Management Development, 25(5), 425-436.
Schein, E.H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping
relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Wilson, S. M. (2009). Organizational consultants and their use of consulting psychology competencies. (Order No. 3383239, Saint Louis University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 82. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/304993691?accountid=27965. (304993691).




Friday, September 26, 2014

Cognitive Ability Test

Abstract
Standardized psychological tests are designed to measure aptitude, intelligence, and skill. When psychological tests are constructed they emphasize factors of reliability, validity, and the standards for developing a feasible and workable test. Industrial and Organizational psychologist develop standardized psychological tests that are used in various organizations to assist with areas of job –performance, critical thinking, competence, mental abilities, and job –placement.

Cognitive Ability Tests: Wonderlic Personnel Test
            Industrial and Organizational (I/O) Psychology focus on workplace development, structure, and organization; it structuralizes around developing methods to apply methodical principles within the workplace. I/O psychology is a field, like other fields of psychology that develop theories and evaluate concepts about how individuals reason, feel, and behave in work. I/O psychologists rely on research, quantitative methods, and testing procedures.
            This document will briefly describe a standardized psychological test “Cognitive Ability Test” specifically the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT) currently used in I/O psychology and concentrate on a particular populations and action of attentiveness in which the test is used. The standardized procedure used in the construction of the test and administration of the test is included. When administering the test, the required standardized conditions and concerns with test bias is also included.
Standardized Psychological Test
            Standardized psychological tests are designed to measure or ascertain such characteristics of an individual’s or group as intellectual capacity, motivation, perception, role behavior, values, and general personality integration (“Psychological Test,” 2012). Industrial and Organizational psychologist emphasize the use of structured psychological testing and focus on the factors of job satisfaction, employee motivation, and a variety of functions surrounding the organizations (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2013).
            A standardized psychological test currently being used by I/O psychologist is the Wonderlic Personnel Test. The WPT predict a comprehensive range of important life outcomes, behaviors, and performances (Natividad, 2006). The tests are one form of predictor used for job performance, and usually provide questions or problems to measure the ability to learn quickly, rationality, intellectual, reading comprehension and other enduring mental abilities (Natividad, 2006). The WPT can be a quick 12 –minute test of mental abilities in adults (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2013). The WPT evaluate an individuals’ ability or skill to solve job –related problems by producing information about their mental abilities, such as oral or calculated reasoning and perceptual abilities like speed in recognizing concepts and perspectives of situations (“Wonderlic,” 2014). Also measured are the critical thinking skills of business professionals that possess competence, capability, and strategic know-how within an organization (Facione, Blohm, & Facione, 2010).
            Cognitive ability tests have advantages and disadvantages during the process of application. Advantages of the tests are the ability to produce valid conclusions for a variation of organizational conclusions (SIOP, Inc., 2014b). The tests are able to envisage job performance for more intricate jobs, cost efficient, and can identify individuals for employment purposes, advancement, or training for those who need the skills and abilities (SIOP, Inc. 2014b). Disadvantages of the test are the possibility to gather different results due to gender and race. The construction of the test could also be overwhelming and time –consuming (SIOP, Inc. 2014b).
Test Construction and Administration
            When constructing and administering the WPT, there are a variety of factors to consider. Factors to consider are the initial constructing process of the test, reliability, validity, information on administration, and data for test interpretation. Constructing the cognitive ability test can be time –consuming and complicated (SIOP, Inc. 2014b). The process consists of research and development and well-kept documentation to support the research process. Questions on the purpose of the test should be considered. For example, what is the concept or experience the test is grounded on? Has the test been constructed according to individuals and groups that are similar to the organizations applicants or employees? And what methods used to develop the test? (SIOP, Inc. 2014b).
            The administrating of the tests focuses on the reliability and validity of the tests. Reliability is the stability of the test results and the validity refers to the accuracy of the interpretations made based on test results (SIOP, Inc. 2014a). The administration of the WPT can be taken quickly with paper and pencil or through an online intelligence test with extensive norms (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2013).
            Information on administration and data test interpretation focus on materials required for administration and score interpretation. Information for administering the tests require test brochures, answer sheets, scoring keys, and administration instructions (SIOP, Inc. 2014a). Data test interpretation focus on whether a test score is have been accurately determined, depending on the distribution of scores of a comparison group. The comparison is usually referred to as a norm group (SIOP, Inc. 2014a). The test developer or publishers are to make available necessary material about the different norm groups that are available for the test being considered (SIOP, Inc. 2014a)
Standardized Conditions and Bias
            Standardized conditions and test bias emphasize on time requirements, credentials and experience, test environment, and the possible biases of tests. Standardized conditions of administering the Wonderlic personnel test should have established time limits whether time is limited or unlimited. The WPT is normally a 12 –minute test but could be done in more or less time considering the test taker and the formation of the test. The test taker should know how long the testing process would take. Credited and experienced (e.g., MA, PhD) professionals should be administering and interpreting the tests, however depending on the focus of the test, skilled administrators are not required. The test environment should comforting and welcoming to the test taker. In order to ensure reliability and validity of the test, the environment should be considered and no individual should feel violated, uncomfortable, or pressured.
            Test bias should be avoided at all costs. During the process of construction and development the test should avoid any biases that may perceive false results of the test.  Evidence that the test does not contain bias on the basis of gender, race, culture, and sex should be provided (SIOP, Inc. 2014a). The test is not expected to have similar results for different groups of people and biased indicators of an outcome of interest should be avoided.
Literature Strategy and Assessment
            Literature strategy and assessment utilized to develop information in reference to cognitive ability tests and Wonderlic personnel test (WPT) was achieved through researching Capella University online library, the SIOP website, the publishers of the Wonderlic testing website, and the eighteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) (2010) and the fourteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (1998). The strategy consisted of researching current tests used by I/O psychologist that measure job –performance and ability, construction (e.g., development, process), administering the test, possible biases, and dependency of the tests (e.g., reliability and validity).
 The assessment focused on literature and research articles available in reference to the chose standardized psychological test. The WPT is widely used within the I/O field and according to Donlon (1998), the Wonderlic is created specifically for use within organizations and educational establishments to measure general cognitive abilities. The WPT strategy is to define whether an individual have the cognitive ability necessary to absorb information and information quickly and solve problems at the level of difficulty that is required (Donlon, 1998)
Conclusion
            Industrial and Organizational psychologist perform various tasks within organizations to help establish employee, employer, and organizational structure. The cognitive ability test, specifically the Wonderlic personnel test (WPT) focuses on individual and group job –performance, reasoning, perceptual abilities, and comprehension.  The process of the WPT consists of the purpose of constructing the test, reliability and validity, test administration, data interpretation, test biases, and credentials and experience of the constructors and administrators.
References
Donlon, T.F. (1998). Review of the Wonderlic basic skills test. In J.C. Impara & B.S. Plake (Eds.), The thirtheenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Retrieved from Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print database.
Facione, P.A., Blohm, S., & Facione, N.C. (2010) Review of the Business critical thinking skills test. In R.A. Spies, J.F. Carlson, & K.F. Gesinger (Eds.), The eighteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Retrieved from Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print database. 
Kaplan, R.M., & Saccuzzo, D.P. (2013). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Natividad, H.R.L. (2006). Prediction of job satisfaction by the wonderlic personnel test. (Order No. 1432496, Roosevelt University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 34-34 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/304929469?accountid=27965. (304929469).
Psychological test. (2012). In Mosby’s dictionary of medicine, nursing, & health professions. Retrieved from http://search.credoreference.com.library.capella.edu/content/entry/ehsmosbymed/psychological_test/0
Society for industrial and organizational psychology (SIOP), Inc. (2014a). Information to consider when creating or purchasing an employment test. Retrieve from http://www.siop.org/workplace/employment%20testing/information_to_consider_when_cre.aspx
Society for industrial and organizational psychology (SIOP), Inc. (2014b). Types of employment tests. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/workplace/employment%20testing/testtypes.aspx

Wonderlic. (2014). Wonderlic cognitive ability test. Retrieved from http://www.wonderlic.com/assessments/ability/cognitive-ability-tests/classic-cognitive-ability-test

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Dispositional Approach and Job Satisfaction

Abstract
Dispositional approach and job satisfaction within organizations can perceived through the facets of the Five Factor Model of dispositional personality traits and through the assumption of individual attitudes. Dispositional personality traits of the Five Factor Model: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience focuses on characteristic patterns of thinking, behaving, and feeling. Dispositional approach of assuming individual attitudes focuses on motivational a characteristic that varies according to individuals needs and motives.



Dispositional Approach and Job Satisfaction
Introduction
            Dispositional approach assumes individuals stability and long-lasting dispositions to display certain behaviors, attitudes, and emotions. Dispositional theory assumes that there are a finite number of personality traits that can be measured, evaluated, and observed. This theory connects with the specialization of Industrial and Organizational theory through the concept of understanding job satisfaction. Dispositional theories, assume that job satisfaction is rooted in the personological makeup of the individual (Bowling, Beehr, & Lepisto, 2006).
Dispositions can vary according to situations and can explain why people act in predictable ways in different settings. Individuals have different sets of dispositions that vary in strengths and imply unique patterns. Dispositional approach assumes various traits, which are continuing qualities that individuals possess in different amounts. Traits can be viewed through theorist Gordon Allport (1897-1967), Raymond Cattell (1905-1998), and Hans J. Eysenck (1916-1997). Trait theory of Gordon Allport assumed three different kinds of traits: Central traits, characteristics that organize and control behavior; Secondary traits, characteristics that are more specific to certain situations and control far less behavior; Cardinal traits, which are dispositions that are so general and pervasive that they govern virtually everything a person does (Feist, Feist, & Roberts, 2013).
Raymond Cattell's trait theory assumes three sources that are required for any analysis of the dimensions of personality. The three sources are L-data: Gathered from one's life records. Q-data: information gathered from questionnaires and interviews. T-data: information obtained from objective testing situations. Eysenck focused on organizational traits that could be grouped under three dimensions Extraversion/Introversion (E), Neuroticism/-Stability (N), and Psychoticism/Superego Function (P). These dimensions characterize individuals based on their orientation toward stimulations from specific environments and measures emotional stability-instability. Eysenck trait theory groups the Five Factor Model of personality that can be integrated to capture the full complexity of human personality.
This document will briefly discuss dispositional approach and job satisfaction. Discussed within the introduction is the perception of dispositional approach and traits theories that connect the perception of dispositional theory. Dispositional approach and job satisfaction within this document will focuses on organizational and employee perceptions according to the specialization of Industrial and Organizational psychology. Included within this document is the rationale in choosing dispositional theory and two prime sources in review of dispositional approach and job satisfaction.
Rationale
The rationale in choosing Dispositional Theory was the assumptions of dispositional approach assumes two approaches, such as stability of personality and differences between individuals. Stability of personality assumes that people display consistency in their actions, thoughts, and feelings between situations and over time. Differences between individuals assume composition of dispositions varies from person to person. Individual personality perceives a pattern of dispositions which forms variations of characteristics.
Through dispositional theory, organizational traits can be grouped under facets of the five factor model. The five factor model characterizes people according to his or her orientation toward sources of stimulations depending on the environment (work, social, et. al. ). Through the five factor theory, dispositional traits perceive behavior as complex and influenced by many traits.
Primary Sources
Through primary sources, dispositional theory and job satisfaction assumes that an employee’s attitude about his or her job originates from an internal state and through dispositional personality traits of the five factor model. Through two primary source articles, dispositional approach can be linked within understanding facets of job satisfaction within organizations.
Primary source article “The Dispositional Approach to Job Satisfaction: More than A Mirage but not yet an Oasis” by Staw and Cohen-Charash (2005) discusses the dispositional approach to job satisfaction within organizations and the employees. Organizations can mold an individual's perceptions through socialization and group influence. Organizations are substantial on an individual's attitude and behaviors (Staw & Cohen-Charash, 2005). According to Staw and Cohen-Charash, (2005) job satisfaction can be viewed in various processing steps according to how individual differences influence attitude and personality variables. Dispositional approaches assume organizations contribute equally to individual attitude and behavioral actions according to an individual's responsibilities, pay rate, and social standings. 
Organizations look to achieve individuals that transcribe themselves in terms of background and personality. Studies conducted on dispositional approach and job satisfaction have connected attitudes in relation with dispositions according to what type of job an individual holds and stability (Staw & Cohen-Charash, 2005). Jobs satisfaction stability can be viewed through dispositional factors that influence work-related attitudes and determinants of the work environment. Dispositional theories are a combination of several thoughts about human personality (Bowling, Beehr, & Lepisto, 2006).
The second primary source, “The personality dispositional approach to job satisfaction and organizational commitment” by Tziner, Waismal-Manor, Vardi, and Brodman (2008) this article focuses on personality traits characterized by the five factor model for views of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be connected to attitudes depending on aspects of work conditions, recognition, and pay scale (Tziner et. al., 2008).
The five factor model of dispositional personality traits characterize independent variables, such as Neuroticism, poor emotional adjustment, anxiety, insecurity, and hostility; Extraversion, sociable, active, and experience positivity; Openness to Experience, nonconforming and eccentric; Agreeableness, trusting, caring, and gentle; and Conscientiousness, achievement and dependability (Tziner et. al., 2008). The perspective of job satisfaction within an organization, dispositional approach view personality traits as an influence on job satisfaction. The dispositional approach of the five factor model assumes that a combination of traits, such as agreeableness and conscientiousness can lead to job satisfaction. However a combination of neuroticism and conscientiousness can lead to facets of anxiety and stress of trying to overachieve (Tziner et. al., 2008).
Job satisfaction concepts of the five factor model present positive and negative perceptions of individual characteristics (Funder, 2010). Through combinations of personality traits, perceptions concluded that most are related to job satisfaction without the contention of neuroticism (Sirgy, 2012). The five factors closely describe facets of characteristics that connect to job satisfaction and hold various influences as factors satisfaction and stability within organizations (Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002).
Conclusion
            Dispositional theories are a combination of several thoughts about human personality. The dispositional approach focuses on the predisposition to experience related to behavior over a period of time. Accordingly, this approach assumes various concepts of dispositional personality traits and attitudes that may originate from an individual internal state (Staw & Cohen-Carash, 2005). Dispositional approach and job satisfaction can be perceived through the Five Factor Model of dispositional personality traits and the assumptions of attitudes. Each perception conceives a notion on dispositional approach to job satisfaction, personality variables, and individual differences.



References
Bowling, N.A., Beehr, T.A., & Lepisto, L. R. (2006). Beyond job satisfaction: a five-year prospective analysis of the dispositional approach to work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 315-330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.04.004
Feist, G., Feist, J., Roberts, T.A. (2013) Theories of Personality, Humanities & Social Sciences. McGraw- Hill.
Funder, D. (2010). The Personality Puzzle. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company
Judge, T. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). Dispositional affect and job satisfaction: A review and theoretical extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 67-98.
Sirgy, J. M., (2012). The Psychology of Quality of Life: Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, and Eudaimonia. New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Staw, B. M. & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2005). The dispositional approach to job satisfaction: More than a mirage, but not yet an oasis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 57-78. DOI: 10.1002/job.299
Tziner, A., Waismal-Manor, R., Vardi, N. & Brodman, A. (2008). The personality dispositional approach to job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Psychology Reports, 103, 435-442. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.103.2.435-442