Abstract
Dispositional approach
and job satisfaction within organizations can perceived through the facets of
the Five Factor Model of dispositional personality traits and through the
assumption of individual attitudes. Dispositional personality traits of the
Five Factor Model: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness,
and Openness to Experience focuses on characteristic patterns of thinking, behaving,
and feeling. Dispositional approach of assuming individual attitudes focuses on
motivational a characteristic that varies according to individuals needs and
motives.
Dispositional
Approach and Job Satisfaction
Introduction
Dispositional approach assumes individuals stability and
long-lasting dispositions to display certain behaviors, attitudes, and
emotions. Dispositional theory assumes that there are a finite number of
personality traits that can be measured, evaluated, and observed. This theory
connects with the specialization of Industrial and Organizational theory
through the concept of understanding job satisfaction. Dispositional theories,
assume that job satisfaction is rooted in the personological
makeup of the individual (Bowling, Beehr, & Lepisto, 2006).
Dispositions
can vary according to situations and can explain why people act in predictable
ways in different settings. Individuals have different sets of dispositions
that vary in strengths and imply unique patterns. Dispositional approach
assumes various traits, which are continuing qualities that individuals possess
in different amounts. Traits can be viewed through theorist Gordon Allport
(1897-1967), Raymond Cattell (1905-1998), and Hans J. Eysenck (1916-1997).
Trait theory
of Gordon Allport assumed three different kinds of traits: Central traits,
characteristics that organize and control behavior; Secondary traits,
characteristics that are more specific to certain situations and control far
less behavior; Cardinal traits, which are dispositions that are so general and
pervasive that they govern virtually everything a
person does (Feist, Feist, & Roberts, 2013).
Raymond
Cattell's trait theory assumes three sources that are required for any analysis
of the dimensions of personality. The three sources are L-data: Gathered from
one's life records. Q-data: information gathered from questionnaires and
interviews. T-data: information obtained from objective testing situations. Eysenck focused on organizational traits that could be grouped under three
dimensions Extraversion/Introversion (E), Neuroticism/-Stability (N), and
Psychoticism/Superego Function (P). These dimensions characterize individuals
based on their orientation toward stimulations from specific environments and
measures emotional stability-instability. Eysenck trait theory groups the Five
Factor Model of personality that can be integrated to capture the full
complexity of human personality.
This
document will briefly discuss dispositional approach and job satisfaction.
Discussed within the introduction is the perception of dispositional approach and
traits theories that connect the perception of dispositional theory.
Dispositional approach and job satisfaction within this document will focuses
on organizational and employee perceptions according to the specialization of
Industrial and Organizational psychology. Included within this document is the
rationale in choosing dispositional theory and two prime sources in review of
dispositional approach and job satisfaction.
Rationale
The
rationale in choosing Dispositional Theory was the assumptions of dispositional
approach assumes two approaches, such as stability of personality and
differences between individuals. Stability of personality assumes that people
display consistency in their actions, thoughts, and feelings between situations
and over time. Differences between individuals assume composition of
dispositions varies from person to person. Individual personality perceives a
pattern of dispositions which forms variations of characteristics.
Through
dispositional theory, organizational traits can be grouped under facets of the
five factor model. The five factor model characterizes people according to his
or her orientation toward sources of stimulations depending on the environment
(work, social, et. al. ). Through the five factor theory,
dispositional traits perceive behavior as complex and influenced by many
traits.
Primary
Sources
Through
primary sources, dispositional theory and job satisfaction assumes that an
employee’s attitude about his or her job originates from an internal state and
through dispositional personality traits of the five factor model. Through two
primary source articles, dispositional approach can be linked within
understanding facets of job satisfaction within organizations.
Primary
source article “The Dispositional
Approach to Job Satisfaction: More than A Mirage but not yet an Oasis” by
Staw and Cohen-Charash (2005) discusses the dispositional approach to job
satisfaction within organizations and the employees. Organizations can mold an
individual's perceptions through socialization and group influence.
Organizations are substantial on an individual's attitude and behaviors (Staw
& Cohen-Charash, 2005). According to Staw and Cohen-Charash, (2005) job
satisfaction can be viewed in various processing steps according to how
individual differences influence attitude and personality variables.
Dispositional approaches assume organizations contribute equally to individual
attitude and behavioral actions according to an individual's responsibilities,
pay rate, and social standings.
Organizations
look to achieve individuals that transcribe themselves in terms of background
and personality. Studies conducted on dispositional approach and job
satisfaction have connected attitudes in relation with dispositions according
to what type of job an individual holds and stability (Staw &
Cohen-Charash, 2005). Jobs satisfaction stability can be viewed through
dispositional factors that influence work-related attitudes and determinants of
the work environment. Dispositional theories are a combination of several
thoughts about human personality (Bowling, Beehr, & Lepisto, 2006).
The
second primary source, “The personality
dispositional approach to job satisfaction and organizational commitment” by
Tziner, Waismal-Manor, Vardi, and Brodman (2008) this article focuses on
personality traits characterized by the five factor model for views of job
satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be connected to attitudes depending on
aspects of work conditions, recognition, and pay scale (Tziner et. al., 2008).
The
five factor model of dispositional personality traits characterize independent
variables, such as Neuroticism, poor emotional adjustment, anxiety, insecurity,
and hostility; Extraversion, sociable, active, and experience positivity;
Openness to Experience, nonconforming and eccentric; Agreeableness, trusting,
caring, and gentle; and Conscientiousness, achievement and dependability
(Tziner et. al., 2008). The perspective of job satisfaction within an
organization, dispositional approach view personality traits as an influence on
job satisfaction. The dispositional approach of the five factor model assumes
that a combination of traits, such as agreeableness and conscientiousness can
lead to job satisfaction. However a combination of neuroticism and
conscientiousness can lead to facets of anxiety and stress of trying to
overachieve (Tziner et. al., 2008).
Job
satisfaction concepts of the five factor model present positive and negative
perceptions of individual characteristics (Funder, 2010). Through combinations
of personality traits, perceptions concluded that most are related to job
satisfaction without the contention of neuroticism (Sirgy, 2012). The five factors
closely describe facets of characteristics that connect to job satisfaction and
hold various influences as factors satisfaction and stability within
organizations (Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002).
Conclusion
Dispositional theories are a combination of several
thoughts about human personality. The dispositional approach focuses on the
predisposition to experience related to behavior over a period of time.
Accordingly, this approach assumes various concepts of dispositional
personality traits and attitudes that may originate from an individual internal
state (Staw & Cohen-Carash, 2005). Dispositional approach and job
satisfaction can be perceived through the Five Factor Model of dispositional
personality traits and the assumptions of attitudes. Each perception conceives
a notion on dispositional approach to job satisfaction, personality variables,
and individual differences.
References
Bowling,
N.A., Beehr, T.A., & Lepisto, L. R. (2006). Beyond job satisfaction: a
five-year prospective analysis of the
dispositional approach to work attitudes. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 315-330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.04.004
Feist, G., Feist, J., Roberts, T.A. (2013) Theories
of Personality, Humanities & Social Sciences. McGraw- Hill.
Funder, D. (2010). The Personality Puzzle. New York, NY:
W.W. Norton & Company
Judge,
T. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). Dispositional affect and job satisfaction: A
review and theoretical extension. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 67-98.
Sirgy,
J. M., (2012). The Psychology of Quality
of Life: Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, and Eudaimonia. New York,
NY: Springer Publishing
Staw,
B. M. & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2005). The dispositional approach to job
satisfaction: More than a mirage, but not yet an oasis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 57-78. DOI: 10.1002/job.299
Tziner,
A., Waismal-Manor, R., Vardi, N. & Brodman, A. (2008). The personality
dispositional approach to job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Psychology Reports, 103, 435-442. DOI:
10.2466/pr0.103.2.435-442
No comments:
Post a Comment